Ephesians 1:3-14 (NRSV)
Spiritual Blessings in Christ
3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord
Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the
heavenly places, 4just as he chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world to be holy and
blameless before him in love. 5He destined us for adoption as his children through
Jesus Christ, according to the good pleasure of his will, 6to the praise of his
glorious grace that he freely bestowed on us in the Beloved. 7In him we have
redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to
the riches of his grace 8that he lavished on us. With all wisdom and insight 9he has made known to us
the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure that he set forth in
Christ, 10as a plan for the fullness of time, to gather up all
things in him, things in heaven and things on earth. 11In Christ we have also
obtained an inheritance, having been destined according to the purpose of
him who accomplishes all things according to his counsel and will, 12so that we, who were the
first to set our hope on Christ, might live for the praise of his glory. 13In him you also, when
you had heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and had believed
in him, were marked with the seal of the promised Holy Spirit; 14this is the pledge of our inheritance towards redemption
as God’s own people, to the praise of his glory.
I am indebted to William Barclay for this
reflection.
Barclay points out that the
whole of this reading (verses 3-14) – in the original – is one single long
sentence. It is not so much reasoned statement but ‘… a lyrical song of praise
…’ He is not thinking in logical stages, but ‘… because gift after gift and
wonder after wonder from God pass before his eyes and enter into his mind …’
We make sense of it by breaking
it up into manageable pieces:
(i) At the core of the Christian
life is God’s choice: Paul did not choose God – God chose him! Jesus made this
point strongly as recorded in John 15:16. To Paul, everything was of God and
this caused him to give thanks. It would not be that great if man chose God, it
is wonderful that God chose man.
(ii) Paul thinks of the bounty
of God’s choice: God chose us to bless us with those things that are only
available from heaven. There are many things that we can achieve for ourselves:
skills, position, material goods; but what we can never achieve for ourselves
is ‘goodness’ or ‘peace of mind’. Barclay comments: “God chose us to give us
those things which he alone can give.”
A moment’s reflection takes this
further. There remains today the important question of what is meant by ‘good’.
Many say that it is that which provides happiness for the majority; but what
about sizable minorities? Are they to be utterly miserable because only the
majority count? Society has unquestioningly accepted this as just the way it is
in a democracy, i.e. that misery is the lot of all too many. Because 51 % are
happy it is just illogical that the wishes of 49% should not be considered!
Others suggest that ‘goodness’
like ‘yellow’ cannot be defined at all – you know it when you experience it
intuitively. But people’s intuition does not always agree (even though on the
basics they have a point). But this is not the place for a detailed
philosophical discussion of ‘goodness’, what matters here is that it is not
something earned or deserved – like faith – it is a gift from God and is linked
with Barclay’s last point and that is that we are chosen for a purpose.
(iii) We are chosen to be holy
and blameless. The Greek word for ‘holy’ is ‘hagios’ which means difference and separation. A church is holy
because its purpose is different; ministers’ are holy because they are meant to
be different to others; God is supremely holy because God is so completely
different.
In the early Church (and it is
my experience in Britain today) being Christian, and this means being
different, means that the people of the world sometimes even hate you because
they cannot understand why you are so different. Barclay suggests that the
Church has got things wrong in the sense that some have tried to erase this
difference between being a Christian and being worldly; some are reluctant to
make a stand, reluctant to challenge sin, reluctant to impose standards,
because they want to attract people and become popular. Barclay concludes: “In
point of fact a Christian should be identifiable in the world … Our being
different ought not to take us out of the world; it should make us different within the world.”
It should be easy to identify
the Christian within the school, the shop, the factory, the office, the
hospital ward, the law court – anywhere. And this is the difference: we ought
not merely to behave as human law requires but rather within the laws of
Christ. This meant us needing to disobey the apartheid laws, when we lived in
South Africa, because they contravened the laws of Christ!
Sadly, the world we inhabit is
so conditioned to its own ways, that, being a Christian can mean getting into
trouble, as was the case with the nurse who offered to pray for a patient;
people being expelled from their union. But, if enough Christians became
‘hagios’ – holy – answerable to Christ, they would revolutionize society – for
the good! And in the midst of our present circumstances, don’t we need a
revolution in our way of thinking, because our economy, education, morals are
rightly being questioned?
But we are not only expected to
be holy we are also meant to be blameless – ‘amomos’ – we need to offer ourselves as a sacrifice, giving every
part of our lives to God. Barclay explains: “… it is to challenge man to make
his whole life so perfect that it is a fit offering to God …”
We Christians ought to be
different – good people – because we have been made good – sanctified - by the
grace of God. This should be obvious to all and be as transparent as the
goodness of Mother Teresa, St Francis and all the great saints. Impossible! No
because it is not our doing it is what God does in us – the reason why he has
chosen us. When we are good and holy and blameless we do not become arrogant or
proud because we know this is God’s doing for with us because such virtues are
impossible for us to achieve. Barclay concludes:
“… the Christian sets no
value on the judgements of human standards, but thinks only of how to satisfy
the scrutiny of Christ …’
Ephesians 1:5-6:
5He destined us for
adoption as his children through Jesus Christ, according to the good pleasure
of his will, 6to the praise of his glorious grace that he freely
bestowed on us in the Beloved.
These verses include the lovely
image of adoption and it is worth a brief re-visit.
It gives God pleasure to adopt
us into his family. This is a lovely thought and is increasingly so for me as I
have now spent so many years contemplating the greatness of God with my
philosophy students. To think of St Anslem’s profound definition of God as “…
that, than which, nothing greater can be conceived …” This creator of
everything that exists – universe after universe – and that which is beyond
human understanding – so great – yet cares for Mark Andrew Smith and David Rhys
Owen enough as to adopt us into his family – is a wonderful thought.
A reminder of the process of
adoption …
In the Roman Law that was
operational at the time of St Paul, family law was based on the principle of ‘patria potestas’ – the father’s power –
which was absolute: a father could sell a child into slavery and even kill his
own child! A child could not possess anything even inheritances or gifts unless
the father allowed it and he could take these things back if he so willed. So
it was a serious step to move from one ‘patria potestas’ to another.
It was carried out in the form
of a symbolic sale in which copper and scales were used. Twice the real father
sold the child and twice he bought the child back, but on the third occasion
the sale went through. After this the adopting father went to the principal
Roman Magistrate – the Praetor – and pleaded the case for the adoption. Once
this was completed the adopted child had all the rights of a legitimate child
in the new family and lost all the rights to the old family.
Barclay applies all this to the
experience of the Christian. We were members of the family of the world and
absolutely in the power of sin. God, through Jesus, has taken us out of that
power into His power. Our adoption into God’s family ‘… cancels and wipes out
the past and we are made new. We have passed from the family of the world and
of evil into the family of God …’
Ephesians
1:7-8:
7In him we have
redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to
the riches of his grace 8that he lavished on us. With all wisdom and insight
…
In this section we encounter
three of the great ideas of the Christian faith: (i) redemption, (ii)
forgiveness and (iii) wisdom and insight:
(i) Redemption: Here the word
used is ‘apolutrosis’ which literally
means ‘to ransom’. It was commonly used to refer to ransoming a prisoner of war
or a slave or freeing a person from the death penalty for a crime. It was used
for God’s ransoming of the people of Israel from slavery in Egypt. Barclay
comments:
“In every case the
conception is the delivering or the setting free of a person from a situation
from which they themselves were powerless to liberate themselves, or from the
penalty which they themselves could never have paid.”
This is precisely what Jesus
does for us, in that we are powerless without God’s grace, and fall under the
domination of sin. We know the wrongness of things in our lives, but we are
powerless to do anything about it.
(ii) Forgiveness: The ancient
world was haunted by the sense of sin. This was the theme of the whole of the
Old Testament. Barclay comments:
“It might well be said
that the whole of the Old Testament is an expansion of the saying, ‘The soul
that sins, it shall die.’ (Ezekiel 18:4)”
Deep down, all people are
conscious of their guilt and stand in terror at the thought of God. Barclay
illustrates this by suggesting that all the plays of Aeschylus can be seen to
be founded on but one text: “The doer shall suffer.” He adds:
“Once a man had done an
evil thing Nemesis was on his heels; soon or late Nemesis would catch up on
him; and punishment followed sin as certainly as night followed day.”
Jesus changed all this because
he opened the way to God; he teaches us not of God’s anger, but of his love and
forgiveness.
(iii) Wisdom and insight: The
two words used in Greek are ‘sophia’ and ‘phronesis’ and the Greeks believed
that if a person possessed these things, they had everything they needed for
life.
Once more Barclay comes into his
own by explaining the cultural context. He explains that Aristotle defined
‘sophia’ as the thing of the searching intellect and the questioning mind and
it is ‘sophia’ that is the answer to the eternal problems of life and death,
God and humankind and time and eternity.
‘Phronesis’ (in English – prudence) is the knowledge of human
affairs where planning is necessary, or as Plutarch explained – the practical
knowledge of the things which concern us. Cicero was of the view that
‘phronesis’ was the knowledge of the things which are to be sought and which
are to be avoided; Plato spoke of the disposition of the mind which enables us
to judge what things are to be done and which things are not to be done.
Barclay concludes:
“In other words,
‘phronesis’ is the most practical thing in the world. It is the sound sense
which enables men to meet and to solve the practical problems of everyday life
and living.”
Here, St Paul is saying that
what Jesus brings is ‘sophia’ – the knowledge of eternal things, the
intellectual knowledge that satisfies the mind; and ‘phronesis’ – the practical
knowledge - which equips us for everyday living.
What a lovely balance. With
Jesus – and his living presence within our lives today and every day – we are
given the tools to deal with the problems of both eternity and time – or as
Barclay concludes:
“Christ gives to us the ability
to see the great ultimate truths of eternity and to solve the problems of each
moment of time.”
Redemption, forgiveness, wisdom
and insight – what lovely gifts – all free and unconditional to those who would
receive them.
No comments:
Post a Comment