Sunday 25 November 2012

The Epistle for Advent Sunday


1 Thessalonians 3:9-end (NRSV)

9How can we thank God enough for you in return for all the joy that we feel before our God because of you? 10Night and day we pray most earnestly that we may see you face to face and restore whatever is lacking in your faith.
11 Now may our God and Father himself and our Lord Jesus direct our way to you. 12And may the Lord make you increase and abound in love for one another and for all, just as we abound in love for you. 13And may he so strengthen your hearts in holiness that you may be blameless before our God and Father at the coming of our Lord Jesus with all his saints. 

Brother,

It is indeed a pleasure to reflect on Paul’s first letter to the Thessalonians, probably one of the earliest writings now part of the New Testament.

Paul speaks of the joy he experienced because of the Thessalonian church – ‘… the joy of one who had created something which would stand the tests and temptations of time …’ You know better than me of the joy a parent who can point to a child who has done well as you have four boys, but even I can know this as Gareth flourishes in what he does. He is in a very competitive environment and does not always come out tops, but when he does (e.g. in a recent science test) it is a joy to share in his delight.  Paul was so proud of the way in which this Church was flourishing as a parent feels joy for a child.

There is also prayer. Paul prayed. Barclay makes a lovely comment: “… We will never know from how much sins we have been saved and how much temptation we have conquered because someone has prayed for us.’ He continues with a lovely illustration:

A servant girl became a member of a Church. She was asked what Christian work she did. She said that she had not the opportunity to do much because her duties were so constant, but, she said, “When I go to bed I take the morning newspaper to my bed with me; and I read the births and I pray for the all little babies; and I read the notices of marriage and I pray that those who have been married may be happy; and I read the announcements of death and I pray that the sorrowing may be comforted. No man can ever tell what tides of grace flowed from that attic bedroom. When we can serve people no other way, when, like Paul, we are unwillingly separated from them, there is one thing we can still do – we can pray for them.

Paul also prays that God would open a way for him to travel to Thessalonica. Barclay points out that Paul was in the habit of praying about everything including the ordinary, everyday things, even simple journeys. Barclay comments:

One of the great and grave mistakes of life is to turn to God only in the great moments and overpowering emergencies and the shattering crises … In ordinary things we disregard Him, thinking we can manage well enough by ourselves; in the emergency we clutch at Him, knowing that we cannot get through without Him.

Barclay concludes, that by only coming to God when there is trouble we are living a ‘God-rescued life’, when real living is a ‘God-directed life’.

Paul also prays that the Thessalonians will be enabled to fulfil the law of love in their daily lives. We often find living the Christian life difficult, especially in the mundane, ordinary relationships, and this is because we are trying to live in our own strength alone. Barclay puts it this way:

The man who goes out in the morning without prayer is, in effect saying, “I can quite well tackle today by myself.” The man who lays himself to rest without speaking to God, is in effect saying, “I can bear whatever consequences today has brought myself.”

The author of that excellent book The 39 Steps, John Buchan, described an atheist as one who “… has no invisible means of support …”

To try to live without God is impossible!

Paul also prays for ultimate safety. Now he is thinking of the end of time, the Second Coming and Judgement. Here Paul prays that God would preserve His people that they may be blameless and that on that day they would not be ashamed.

Shame is a much lost concept in the western world. We now have TV programmes that deliberately humiliate people; celebrity is worshipped for its baring all and its shameful sexual and other antics; there is a whole industry – and sadly a lucrative and popular one at that – that thrives on the loss of human dignity.
For me there is a useful yardstick: Is what I am doing or saying going to enhance my dignity or might I feel ashamed?

Barclay suggests that the only way to prepare to meet God is to live daily with God and ends with:

The shock of that day will not be for those who have so lived that they have become friends with God, but for those who meet God as a terrible stranger.

What wonderful thoughts from St Paul and William Barclay as we enter the season of Advent.
Blessings,

David



Thursday 22 November 2012

Revelation 1:4-8 (New International Version)
Greetings and doxology
4John, to the seven churches in the province of Asia: Grace and peace to you from him who is, and who was, and who is to come, and from the seven spirits[a] before his throne, 5and from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood, 6and has made us to be a kingdom and priests to serve his God and Father—to him be glory and power for ever and ever! Amen. 7Look, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even those who pierced him; and all the peoples of the earth will mourn because of him. So shall it be! Amen. 8"I am the Alpha and the Omega," says the Lord God, "who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty."
Revelation is a letter written to the 7 churches which were in Asia. Barclay gives us excellent background to this wonderful book. He says that in the New Testament Asia is never used to refer to the continent but always the Roman Province. Once it had been the kingdom of Attalus the Third, then he willed it to the Romans at his death. It was what we now call Turkey and there were by no means only 7 churches there at the time John was writing. Why then did John only single out 7?

Possibly these churches were regarded as the centres of seven postal districts, being all on a kind of ring road which circled the interior of the province. Letters delivered to these 7 cities would be easily circulated to the surrounding area. And since every letter had to be hand-written, it was important to reach as many people as possible with each letter.

Another possible reason was John's preference for the number 7. It occurs 54 times! There are 7 candlesticks, 7 stars, 7 lamps, 7 seals, 7 horns, 7 eyes, 7 thunders etc etc. The ancient people regarded 7 as the perfect number, and it ran all through Revelation. It is widely held that 7 is the perfect number because it stands for completeness. So, when John wrote to the 7 churches, could he have been writing to the “whole” church? After all, John keeps on saying, “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the Churches.
John begins by sending them the blessing of God. He sends them grace, and this means all the undeserved gifts of the love of God. He sends them peace, which R.H. Charles described as "The harmony restored between God and man through Christ." But there are two amazing things in this blessing which Barclay points out.

i) John sends blessings from "him who is, and who was, and who is to come". That is a common title for God. This is what in Hebrews so beautifully became "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever" (Hebrews 13:8). But to get the full meaning of this we must look at it in the Greek because John bursts the bonds of grammar to show his reverence for God. Barclay points out that we translate the phrase "from him who is"; but that is not what the Greek says. The Greek says " from "he who is". It is as if John refuses to change the grammar out of reverence for God - even though the rules of grammar demand it!

 John is not finished with his amazing use of language. The second phrase is "and who was ". "Who was" would have been a Greek participle which means not only "to be" but "to become". But John utterly refuses to apply any word to God that will imply an change; and so he uses the Greek phrase that is grammatically impossible and that no-one ever used before. In the terrible days of persecution in which John was writing he maintained in his mind and his writing the changelessness of God and used defiance of grammar to underline his faith.
Revelation 1:4-8 (New International Version) Greetings and doxology

From now on in the book of Revelation, in almost every passage we note the John continues to use the Old Testament. He personally was soaked in the Old Testament and it was almost impossible for him to write a passage without quoting it. John was living in a time when to be a Christian was an agonizing thing. He himself knew banishment and imprisonment and hard labour. And there were many who knew death in it's most cruel forms. The best way to maintain courage and hope in such a situation was to remember that God had never failed in the past.
  
In this passage, says Barclay, John sets out the motto and the text for his whole book and his confidence in the triumphant return of Christ, which would rescue Christians in distress from the cruelty of their enemies. To Christians the return of Christ is a promise on which to feed the soul. To the enemies of Christ the return of Christ is a threat. To make the point John again quotes the Old Testament from Zechariah 12:10 which contains the words, "When they look on him whom they have pierced , they shall mourn for him, as one mourns for an only child, and weeps bitterly over him as one, as one weeps over a first-born."

 The story behind this saying is that God gave his people a good shepherd; but the people in their disobedience killed him and took to themselves evil and self-seeking shepherds. But the day will come when in the grace of God they will bitterly repent and in that day they will look on the good shepherd whom they have pierced and will sorrowfully lament for him and for what they have done. John takes that picture and applies it to Jesus. We crucified him but there will come a day when we will look on him again; and this time, he will not be a broken figure on a cross, but a regal figure to whom universal power has been given.

Sunday 18 November 2012



John 18:33-37 (NRSV)

33 Then Pilate entered the headquarters again, summoned Jesus, and asked him, ‘Are you the King of the Jews?’ 34Jesus answered, ‘Do you ask this on your own, or did others tell you about me?’ 35Pilate replied, ‘I am not a Jew, am I? Your own nation and the chief priests have handed you over to me. What have you done?’ 36Jesus answered, ‘My kingdom is not from this world. If my kingdom were from this world, my followers would be fighting to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. But as it is, my kingdom is not from here.’ 37Pilate asked him, ‘So you are a king?’ Jesus answered, ‘You say that I am a king. For this I was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone who belongs to the truth listens to my voice.’


The Gospel reading moves back to John as next Sunday is the feast of Christ the King. Pilate asks Jesus if he is the king of the Jews. Pilate seems perplexed – what is the issue? In verse 35 he explains: “Your nation and the chief priests have handed you over to me. What have you done?” Well, in the eyes of the law, Jesus had done nothing wrong. Jesus makes the case very clearly that there is nothing for the temporal powers to be worried about, as if he were indeed wanting to become a political ruler, he had amassed enough support. This is evident in his triumphal entry into Jerusalem and he was also able to get away with the outrageous cleansing of the Temple. Jesus said: ‘… If my kingdom were from this world, my followers would be fighting to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. But as it is, my kingdom is not from here.’

Jesus was wanting to do something far more radical; his kingdom deals with the essence of who people are. His kingdom does not require armies and taxes to support them – just transformed lives. I am fascinated by the emphasis on ‘truth’ and find it surprising that the compilers of the Lectionary end the passage at verse 37, as the key statement for me in this passage is verse 38 where Pilate asks Jesus: “What is truth?” But before I go there, let us reflect, briefly, on the whole issue of government. Here J C Ryle has some interesting observations.

Ryle suggests that Jesus  knew that ‘… the prosperity of kingdoms is wholly dependent on the blessing of God, and that kings are as much bound to encourage righteousness and godliness, as to punish unrighteousness and immorality …’

It is a joy for me to live in a free society where religious freedom is at the core of what we stand for. I remember when I first arrived, the joy that was mine to be free to be truly me. Britain has prospered, when the Gospel was indeed not just tolerated, but also encouraged. We have the most marvellous health system in the world and this is because of Christian insistence that unless we do this and help people at their point of need, we could be guilty of murder; if we do not have a welfare system that pays pensions, then we do not honour our fathers and our mothers. There was a time when Christian morality was key, and we became one of the great national powers. Ryle continues:

… no Government can expect to prosper which refuses to recognise religion, which deals with its subjects as if they had no souls, and cares not whether they serve God …

And the reason is almost what my students would call a ‘no brainer’. Ryle puts it this way:

The kingdom where there is most industry, temperance, truthfulness, and honesty, will always be the most prosperous of kingdoms.

I am not one for prosperity gospels and the like, but I do believe that we are in the state we are in partly because our society has abandoned the Gospel. Ryle was writing in the height of the 19th century Evangelical Revival – when British society flourished.

To believe is to do, to commit, to work things out in practice.

It would appear that Pilate did not want to condemn Jesus, because he knew he was innocent. Barclay suggests that Pilate was ‘… caught in the mesh of his own past …’ As he had before, Pilate tried to put the responsibility onto someone else – the Jews in this instance. He tried to do what no one can do – and that is - evade dealing with Jesus. No one can deal with Jesus; we must deal with him ourselves. Barclay puts it this way: “There is no escape from a personal decision in regard to Jesus: we must ourselves decide what we will do with him, accept him or reject him.”

Pilate also tried to compromise. Here again Barclay is unequivocal, stating: “No man can compromise with Jesus; no man can serve two masters. We are either for Jesus or against him.”

Pilate’s biggest problem was that he did not have the courage to take the right decision and do the right thing!

Pilate was at sea; he did not want to be bothered with Jewish ways and it is therefore not surprising that he got things wrong because no one can govern effectively if they do not understand their people and ‘… enter their thoughts and minds …’

Pilate was also superstitious rather than religious, and was hesitant because Jesus might in fact be who he claimed to be.
By today’s standards even, Pilate had it ‘made’ – he was at the top of his profession – but in meeting this mysterious man Jesus, came to see that he had missed out on what really mattered. Barclay concludes:
“That day he might have found all that he had missed; but he had not the courage to defy the world in spite of his past, and to take his stand with Christ and a future which was glorious.”

Barclay suggests that we no one can read this story without seeing the sheer majesty of Jesus. There is no sense that Jesus is on trial. When a person faces him, it is not Jesus on trial but the person. It seems as though it is Jesus who is in control and Pilate who is on trial.

Here, Jesus also speaks to us with utter directness about his kingdom: it is not of this earth. The atmosphere in Jerusalem was electric; it was Passover and Pilate would (as usual) have drafted more troops into the city. If Jesus wished to have called for rebellion, he could have done it easily, but he makes it quite clear that his kingdom is in the hearts of people – he aimed at conquest, but his conquest was the conquest of love.
Jesus tells us why he came into the world – he came to tell the truth about God, about themselves and about life. Barclay continues:

“The days of guessings and gropings and half-truths were gone. He came to tell us the truth. This is one of the great reasons why we must either accept or refuse Christ. There is no half-way house about the truth. A man either accepts it or rejects it: and Christ is the truth.”

We belong to the truth and so must listen to his voice …

I have enjoyed Professor Dairmaid McCulloch’s excellent series “The History of Christianity” (BBC49.00 pm) and here it is so evident that Roman Catholicism is but a part of Christendom. Orthodoxy is also a significant part as is Protestantism. For me, it is time that we celebrated and respected differences, because that is all they are. It is not a matter of either or, or that one way is the only way. We are like different states, exercising different ways, but all united under the same sovereign God – with Christ as the King.

In liturgy, in the acceptance of the Bible as Holy Scripture, the  incarnation of Jesus as Emmanuel (God with us) we all have this in common. The Early Church established the paradigm –“Is it evident in the body of people that the Holy Spirit is present?” This made the Gentiles welcome and ended the argument, and this can be said to end future arguments. A few examples: Are there any Gay people who are filled with the Holy Spirit and whom God is using in His Kingdom? Are there women who have the gifts of leadership that should enable them to exercise the ministry of a Bishop? If so, women should be Bishops. Have there been Roman Catholic saints? Yes! Have there been Orthodox saints? Yes! Have there been Anglican, Methodist, Calvinist saints? …I think you get what I am trying to say.

At the time of the Reformation the important question was asked: “What is the Church?” Many agreed that it was where the Body of Christ was clearly present in the work of the Holy Spirit. Luther concluded that there were therefore Catholic Churches and some Lutheran gatherings were not!

Jesus came into the world to establish a kingdom that was based on the truth. And he was the embodiment of the truth. This truth transcends political boundaries and denominational differences. It is wherever Jesus is, where the Written Word is expounded and so enables contact to be made with the Living Word; it is where people are united with Christ, each other and the Communion of Saints in the Eucharist and most importantly, where the body leaves the Church and goes out into the world as the presence of Christ where wethey are. As the hymn writer put it: “Come let us sing, praise to our king …” Jesus is King! 

Monday 12 November 2012

Ideas for a sermon on the Gospel for 18th November


Mark 13:1-8 (NRSV)

The Destruction of the Temple Foretold

13As he came out of the temple, one of his disciples said to him, ‘Look, Teacher, what large stones and what large buildings!’ 2Then Jesus asked him, ‘Do you see these great buildings? Not one stone will be left here upon another; all will be thrown down.’

3 When he was sitting on the Mount of Olives opposite the temple, Peter, James, John, and Andrew asked him privately, 4‘Tell us, when will this be, and what will be the sign that all these things are about to be accomplished?’ 5Then Jesus began to say to them, ‘Beware that no one leads you astray. 6Many will come in my name and say, “I am he!” and they will lead many astray. 7When you hear of wars and rumours of wars, do not be alarmed; this must take place, but the end is still to come. 8For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom; there will be earthquakes in various places; there will be famines. This is but the beginning of the birth pangs.


The disciples were just like us – easily taken in by impressive sights – not least wonderful architecture. By all accounts, Herod’s Temple was a marvel of architecture and wealth and it had been a feature of great significance for hundreds of years. Jesus prophecies its destruction: Some scholars suggest that this might not have been a prophecy of the physical destruction of the Temple; it could have been Jesus talking about the importance, not of the impressive physical, but the more important Spiritual Temple. We will never know for certain.

This is a well-used passage when referring to the end of time and is controversial because it often becomes part of the package of those who become obsessed with it. In this first reflection, I offer an illustration from that excellent website www.esermons.com :

Gregory L. Fisher in Leadership magazine tells of teaching a class at the West African Bible College. One day the class was discussing the Second Coming of Christ. A student asked Fisher a question that took him by surprise. The question was this: “What will he say when he shouts?”

The student said, “Reverend, 1 Thessalonians 4:16 says that Christ will descend from heaven with a loud command. I would like to know what that command will be.”

Fisher wanted to leave the question unanswered, to tell the student that they must not go past what Scripture has revealed, but his mind wandered to an encounter he had earlier in the day with a refugee from the Liberian civil war. The man, a high school principal, told him how he was apprehended by a two‑man death squad. After several hours of terror, as the men described how they would torture and kill him, he narrowly escaped. After hiding in the bush for two days, he was able to find his family and escape to a neighboring country. The escape cost him dearly: two of his children lost their lives. The stark cruelty unleashed on an unsuspecting, undeserving population had touched Fisher deeply. He also saw flashbacks of the beggars that he passed each morning on his way to the office. Every day he saw how poverty destroys dignity, robs people of the best of what it means to be human, and sometimes substitutes the worst of what it means to be an animal. Fisher says even now he is haunted by the vacant eyes of people who have lost all hope.

“Reverend, you have not given me an answer,” the student demanded. “What will [Christ] say?”
The question hadn’t gone away. “Enough,” Fisher said in answer to the question. “He will shout, Enough! when he returns.”

A look of surprise opened the face of the student. “What do you mean, enough?”

And Fisher said firmly, “Enough suffering. Enough starvation. Enough terror. Enough death. Enough indignity. Enough lives trapped in hopelessness. Enough sickness and disease. Enough time. ENOUGH!” (Gregory L. Fisher, Leadership “Second Coming,” 1991. Adapted by King Duncan)

This puts it into – in my mind – its proper perspective.

J C Ryle writes: “Chapters like this ought to be deeply interesting to every true Christian … The rise and fall of worldly empires are events of comparatively small importance in the sight of God … are nothing in His eyes by the side of the mystical body of Christ …”

It was good and interesting to read this because I have to confess that passages like this are not my favourite and this is one of the reasons why the discipline of following the Lectionary is so good for me. I need to preach on this passage on Sunday – and I have not been looking forward to it. So what is Ryle’s contribution that makes it – in his opinion – such an important passage.

The disciples’ admiration for the splendour of the Temple gets an unexpected response from Jesus who ‘… expresses no commendation of the design or workmanship of the gorgeous structure before him …’ Ryles exposition continues.

The true glory of any place of worship has nothing to do with its physical presence and splendour; but in the faith and godliness of its members. It is interesting to note that, even though Jesus, the Jew, knew that the Temple contained the Holy of Holies, the golden candlestick and the altar of burnt offering – all central to Jewish worship at the time, Jesus could find no pleasure in looking at what was obviously a magnificent building! The same holds true for Christians and churches today: what matters is that God’s Word (written and living) and His Spirit are honoured – that is all.

Yet today, Christians are fixated on buildings. Ministries are diluted because people refuse to close churches and chapels that have long since been not viable and millions are spent on the restoration of impressive piles, when people are starving and going in need.

We are naturally inclined to judge things by their outward appearance. Ryle continues:

We are too apt to suppose that where there is a stately ecclesiastical building and a magnificent ceremonial, - carved stone and painted glass, - fine music and impressively dressed ministers, there must be some real religion. And yet there may be no religion at all. It may be all form and show, and appeal to the senses. There may be nothing to satisfy the conscience, nothing to cure the heart.

What matters is that Christ be preached and the Word of God is expounded. The ministers might be ignorant of the Gospel and the worshippers may be dead in their trespasses and sins. Sadly this is true in many places.
I can identify completely with what Ryle is suggesting here: “ … the meanest room where Christ is preached at this day, is more honourable in his eyes than the cathedral of St Peter’s at Rome …’ if the Word is not faithfully preached and the lives of those present are not living letters to be read of all.
It goes without saying that the opposite is also not true. As Ryle adds:

There is no true religion in having a dirty, mean shabby, and disorderly place of worship … But let it be a settled principle in our religion, however beautiful we make our churches, to regard pure doctrine and holy practice as their principle ornaments. … It has no glory if God is not there.

I have mentioned this before, but one of the most beautiful places of worship I have ever attended was the ‘Motherwell Cathedral’ made of throw away, rusted wrought iron, in a squatter camp outside Port Elizabeth in South Africa. It’s Cross and furnishings were fashioned from material from the rubbish dump – but it was spotlessly clean and lovingly maintained. God was there, more than the Cathedral I left behind. In Ryle’s words, sound doctrine and holy practice – Godly lives – ‘… the humblest cottage where the Gospel is preached, is lovely and beautiful …’

Jesus was intimately expanding on his prophecy of the end times to his inner circle, this time including Andrew. Jesus was aware that, before the end of time there would be heresy. And it was early in the history of the Church that heresy arose. Barclay makes the following comment suggesting that heresy arises from three main causes:

Heresy arises from constructing doctrine to suit oneself: Humans have a great ability for wishful thinking. Many people today do this – they claim, for instance - that there is no God because they do not wish there to be a God because it suits their lifestyle. They made outrageous claims that science has proven that there is no God, where the scientific community is saying that there probably is! If the Big Bang is true as the origin of everything, then the choice is either it happened by chance or someone or something started it off. “Chance” – philosophically speaking – requires more faith than God – even if at a minimum as deist God. Even Professor Richard Dawkins – the great anti-theist of our time (he is much more than an atheist) – admitted on Channel 4 to Mark Dowd, the producer of that fantastic documentary, Tsunami – where was God ? – that a deist God is probable. But people want to do as they please – and God makes this uncomfortable for them. One of the great heresies of our day is secularism – and it has been found wanting. Possessions, status, position, wealth and all the other trappings of a Godless society have been shown to be empty and meaningless. Our ethics seems to be dominated by the 11th Commandment – “Thou shalt not be found out!” The whole idea of been accountable – even if no one else knows or finds out – is uncomfortable; the idea of judgement – is a harness on what ”I” want. Barclay comments: “Can it be that the doctrine of hell and the Second Coming have both dropped out of much religious thought because they are both uncomfortable doctrines.

So, this leads to the second cause of heresy, the establishing of a religion that suits people, a religion that will be popular and attractive. To do this, it needs to be watered down. As Barclay writes: “The sting, the condemnation, the humiliation, the moral demand, have to be taken out of it.” Barclay concludes most aptly: “It is not our job to alter Christianity to suit people, but to alter people to suit Christianity.” Some of the Churches in the world have courses that are very popular, but offer quick fix solutions to some of the great moral dilemmas of our time. There are those that simply quote bible passage after bible passage as the answer – and they are full to overflowing boasting thousands upon thousands of members. It is these that people like Dawkins can tear apart – in fact, even my Year 9 class at the grammar school would not be satisfied. We should never be impressed by numbers alone, though we should all rejoice at true revival, but as Jesus was constantly doing with his first disciples, we must make clear the cost of discipleship.
Heresy comes from not being part of a Christian fellowship: When people act in isolation, they are in danger of getting it wrong. Our churches have always stated that our sources of authority are the Bible, reason and tradition (which is the Church of England position) but the Methodists include experience as well. What the Bible says to us today can never be the sole preserve of a person working alone. From the earliest times the Council, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit (experience) came to a like mind of what God was saying – is saying to His people.

Heresy also comes from trying to be completely intelligible: Yes, we are under a duty to try to understand our faith, but it is also true that we are mere finite, contingent beings and the God we seek to know and understand is infinite and we will never fully be able to understand Him and His ways. This means that any expression of our faith that is ‘… neatly stated in a series of propositions and neatly proved in a series of logical steps like a geometrical theorem is an impossibility and a contradiction in terms … As G K Chesterton said, “It is only the fool who tries to get the heavens inside his head, and not unnaturally his head bursts. The wise person is content to get his head inside the heavens. “’ Barclay concludes that “Even at out most intellectual we must remember that there is always – and will always be place for the ultimate mystery before which we can only worship, wonder and adore.” Tertullian put it this way: “I believe, because it is impossible.”

Why is it that people claim that the existence of suffering, war, natural disasters – and all the other realities of human existence – make them challenge God’s existence. From the earliest time, Jesus has told us that this is going to be the case.

Sunday 4 November 2012

Sermon notes on the Gospel for 11 November 2012


Mark 1:14-20 (NRSV)

The Beginning of the Galilean Ministry

14 Now after John was arrested, Jesus came to Galilee, proclaiming the good news of God, 15and saying, ‘The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God has come near; repent, and believe in the good news.’ 

Jesus Calls the First Disciples

16 As Jesus passed along the Sea of Galilee, he saw Simon and his brother Andrew casting a net into the lake—for they were fishermen.17And Jesus said to them, ‘Follow me and I will make you fish for people.’ 18And immediately they left their nets and followed him. 19As he went a little farther, he saw James son of Zebedee and his brother John, who were in their boat mending the nets. 20Immediately he called them; and they left their father Zebedee in the boat with the hired men, and followed him.

Brother,

I have used some other scholars in recent reflections as I have had the benefit of leisure time over half-term, but now, as we enter the next phase of busyness as we return to our School Chaplaincies after the half-term break, it is back to Barclay and his wisdom – and blessing – as we reflect on the Gospel and his insights this year.

In verses 14 and 15 we encounter three great themes of the Christian faith.

Firstly, there is good news: The essence of the message of Jesus is good news for humankind. If we follow the word euvangeligon throughout the New Testament we discover more of what it means:

(a)   It is good news because it is truth (Galatians 2:5; Colossians 1:5). As Barclay comments: “Until Jesus came, men could only grope after God. ‘O that I knew where I might find him,’ cried Job (Job 23:3).” With the coming of Jesus we can now see clearly what God is like – guess work has come to an end.

(b)   It is good news of hope (Colossians 1:23). The ancient world was full of pessimism; in their struggle for goodness, people felt defeated – but the coming of Jesus brings hope to the hopeless heart.

(c)    It is good news of peace (Ephesians 6:15). It is our lot that we struggle with sin and goodness – but in Christ we can find peace as his grace works out his purposes for our lives.
(d)   It is good news of promise (Ephesians 3:6). Jesus reveals that God is not full of threats but love and forgiveness and so is full of promise.

(e)   It is good news of immortality (2 Timothy 1:10). Life is not a one way road to death and the end. In Jesus we are on a road to life and not death.

(f)     It is good news of salvation (Ephesians 1:13). This is not just a liberation from penalty and escape from past sin; ‘… it is the power to live life victoriously and to conquer sin …’

Secondly, there is the word repent: Barclay points out that this is a more complex word than we sometimes think. The Greek word metanoia literally means to change our mind. We sometimes confuse two things: sorrow for the consequences of sin and sorrow for sin. Too many of us would continue to do things if we were confident that we could escape the consequences. Barclay writes: “Repentance means that the person who was in love with sin comes to hate sin because of its exceeding sinfulness.”

Thirdly, there is the word believe: I spent some time on this word in my last reflection with particular reference to Armstrong’s researches. Barclay suggests that ‘believe’ here means to ‘… take Jesus at his word, to believe that God is the kind of God that Jesus told us about, to believe that God so loves the world that he will make any sacrifice to bring us back to himself, to belie that what sounds too good to be true is really true.’

Good thoughts and ideas from WB yet again.

Barclay writes:

A leader must begin somewhere. He must get himself a little band of kindred souls to whom he can unburden his own heart and on whose hearts he may write his message.

Who did Jesus look for:

(i)                 They were simple folk – not from the great halls of learning or religious authority so they were neither learned nor wealthy. Jesus opted for ordinary people. Lincoln once said: “God must love the common people – He made so many of them.” Jesus was of the view that, even ordinary people, if they are willing to give themselves to Him, could change the world – and they did. Barclay concludes: “A person should never think so much of what they think other people think of them as of what Jesus thinks of them.”

(ii)               Notice what they were doing when Jesus called them – just their ordinary day’s work. It was the same with some of the great prophets. Amos was a herdsman and gatherer of sycamore fruit. The call of God can come to a person especially in the midst of the ordinary.

When I was called into the Methodist ministry, my mentor, Dr Arthur Attwell, said to me: “What you are called to is faithfulness where you are in all that you are doing. In this way, God can do great things with and through you.”

It is also interesting to note that Jesus called them to ‘Follow me’. He did not say: “I have a theological system which I would like you to investigate; I have certain theories that I would like you to think over; I have an ethical system that I would like to discuss with you. He said ‘Follow me’.” It is all about relationships – it is about falling in love – it is not necessarily rational. So Barclay concludes: “In the greatest number of cases a man follows Jesus Christ, not because of anything that Jesus said, but because of everything that Jesus is.”

This is why it is who we are more than what we say that has the greatest impact on our ministry. Lovely thoughts; but also a deep challenge.

Jesus offered his first disciples and us – a task! He called them not to ease, but to service. Someone once said that “every person needs something in which they can invest their lives.” So Jesus called his disciples not to a comfortable lifestyle, not to a passive inactivity; he gave them a task in which they would have to spend themselves up, and in the end die for His sake and for the sake of others.

All Christians – not just those of us who are ordained - have a vocation - and that is to live for others. I love Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s reference to Christ as ‘… a man for others …’ – and we are called to be imitators of Christ. It is here that we find fulfilment, as we spend ourselves up in our service of others.

There is a sense that we need to leave our different ‘nets’ behind us as we daily take up the mantle of service and follow in our Lord’s footsteps.

Wishing you every blessing as you return to your ministry at School,

David