John 6:35, 41-51 (NRSV)
35 Jesus said to them, ‘I am the bread of life.
Whoever comes to me will never be hungry, and whoever believes in me will never
be thirsty.
41 Then the Jews began to complain about him
because he said, ‘I am the bread that came down from heaven.’ 42They were
saying, ‘Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know?
How can he now say, “I have come down from heaven”?’ 43Jesus answered
them, ‘Do not complain among yourselves. 44No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father
who sent me; and I will raise that person up on the last day. 45It is written in
the prophets, “And they shall all be taught by God.” Everyone who has heard
and learned from the Father comes to me. 46Not that anyone
has seen the Father except the one who is from God; he has seen the Father. 47Very truly, I
tell you, whoever believes has eternal life. 48I am the bread
of life. 49Your ancestors
ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. 50This is the
bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. 51I am the living
bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live for
ever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.’
This passage is all about why some people rejected
Jesus (and probably still reject him today).
Some of the people of Jesus’ time rejected him because
they were judging things by human and purely external standards. They said that
he was just a carpenter’s son and they had seen him grow up in Nazareth , a rather insignificant village.
They could not understand how a person with a background like this could
possibly be a messenger from God.
But is it not true that we often get messages from God
from the most unlikely people. Mother Teresa used to say how she found Christ
in the poor and destitute in Calcutta ;
others speak of finding God in the most unlikely of places and from the least
expected people. Barclay uses the following illustration from the experience of
T S Lawrence (of Arabia ) to make an important
point.
Lawrence was a great friend of Thomas Hardy. Lawrence began his
military career as a private in the RAF. When on leave, he used to visit Hardy
in his uniform. On one occasion Lawrence ’s
visit coincided with a visit to the Hardy’s by the Mayoress of Dorchester. She
was offended to have to be in the presence of a mere private aircraftman. In
French she complained to Mrs Hardy that ‘… never in all her born days had she
had to sit down to tea with a private soldier. No one said anything: then Lawrence said in perfect
French: “I beg your pardon Madame, but can I be of any use as an interpreter?
Mrs Hardy knows no French!”’
We are God’s children not because of who we are or
what we have done, but because of Jesus and what he has done for us. It is all
of grace. All are one in Christ Jesus our Lord, St Paul reminds us in the letter to the
Galatians. The New Testament speaks of the priesthood of all believers.
We must take special care that we never neglect a
message from God because we do not care for the messenger. Barclay concludes:
“God has
many messengers. His greatest message came through a Galilean carpenter, and
for that very reason some Jews disregarded it.”
Some of the people rejected Jesus
and his message because they were arguing among themselves. They were so taken
up with their arguments that they failed to do what matters most and take the
matter to God. They were all too eager to have their point of view made known,
but did not seem to care to deeply about what God had to say.
This is so much part of human
experience. Quite often, arguments abound because people are not really
listening to each other. When they are not speaking, they are thinking of their
reply rather than what the other person is trying to say. Often, what is needed
is a time for quiet and reflection on what has been said.
There are arguments and debates
abounding in the Church around issues of unity and leadership and sexuality (to
name but a few). I wonder how much listening to God comes into things
sometimes? For me, the issue of sexuality proved particularly difficult because
I find homosexuality so repulsive as a sexual act. I struggled to see how it
could ever be something good and uplifting – until I met some wonderful, holy
and obviously Spirit filled homosexual Christians. I still have difficulty with
the act, but am less concerned about the how and the why and more open to be
accepting and affirming because some obviously have the Spirit of Christ within
them. Was it not this – the presence of the Spirit – that made Peter see the
importance to accept Gentiles?
Perhaps in our Churches, we need
to have fewer debates and discussions and seek rather to discover the voice of
God in the silence?
Perhaps the secret is to talk
less and listen more?
Barclay adds that one needs more
than just listening, one needs also to hear and learn. He suggests that there
are different kinds of listening; there is the listening of:
(i) resentment
(ii) criticism
(iii) superiority
(iv) indifference
(v) the person who is only silent
for the moment because they cannot get a chance to speak
Barclay concludes: “The only
listening that is worth while is that which hears and learns; and that is the
only way to listen to God.”
Barclay
reminds us that the word John uses here is ‘helkuein’ and is the Greek word for
the Hebrew word used by Jeremiah when he speaks of God speaking to the prophet
and the KJV translates the experience as God saying: “With loving-kindness have
I drawn thee …” There is an implication of resistance because it is the same
word used for drawing to shore a heavily laden net filled with fish. (John 21:6
and 11) It is used when explaining how Paul and Silas were brought before the
Magistrates in Philippi (Acts 16:19 ) Barclay gives other examples
as well.
What
is interesting is the fact that God can draw us, but our resistance can ‘…
defeat God’s pull …’ This is another reminder of why I originally lost patience
with Barclay, because as a young Calvinist, I was of the view that no human
could thwart the will of God. But we know that – especially in the shorter term
– this is not only possible, it is the default setting. It is probably true
that the ultimate purposes of God cannot be thwarted – but this side of the
grave – we will never know.
For
me the big issue here is the question: “Are we allowing God to draw us to Him?”
If we do, then we are blessed beyond measure. Other questions follow: “In what
ways are we resisting God?” and “What is God saying to us?”
This
goes back to some earlier reflections where I have contended that the Bible is
vital and essential, but it is just part of the process. We need to use our
reason, we need to confer with others in study, fellowship and prayer, and this
ignites the intuitive meeting of Spirits, God’s Spirit with our spirits and the
conviction, the peace and the joy that results.
This
is too rare an experience for me and the busyness of life so often takes over
and I do not find time to allow myself to be drawn to God. This is especially
true as we go through the frantic time of packing and setting up accounts for
water and gas and electricity and telephone and e-mail and …. the list seems
endless. To make matters worse, there is a problem with our plumbing in Moffat
and so repairs have needed to be in place (the plumber has owned up that it is
his responsibility as he installed it! and so the cost ought not to be too
great.) In addition, a disturbing noise
in the front of our car seems to be £1500 worth of repairs – but then I
purchased an extended warranty and so this too ought to be covered. But the
things of this life can be the resistance that strops us from being drawn to
the presence of God where we receive our deepest nourishment.
Be
still, for the presence of the Lord, the Holy One is near …
Jesus
referred to himself as – ‘the bread of life …’ In the days of Jesus, bread was
the staple food and so Jesus is saying that He is essential for life and as
Barclay adds: “… to refuse the invitation and command of Jesus is to miss life
and die …”
John
links this famous saying with a reference to the experience of the Israelites
during the Exodus (as recorded in the book of Numbers). The people did not need
to wait 40 years before entering the Promised Land, they just refused to face
the dangers after the reports of the returning scouts so they were condemned to
wander in the wilderness – so they missed all the blessing that was waiting for
them.
To
reject Jesus is to miss out on life – in this world and the next but to accept
Jesus and his ways means to find real, meaningful and blessed life in this
world and glory in the next.
No comments:
Post a Comment