Ephesians
1:3-14 NRSV
Spiritual
Blessings in Christ
3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord
Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the
heavenly places, 4just as he chose us in Christ
before the foundation of the world to be holy and blameless before him in love.
5He destined us for adoption as his children through
Jesus Christ, according to the good pleasure of his will, 6to
the praise of his glorious grace that he freely bestowed on us in the Beloved. 7In
him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses,
according to the riches of his grace 8that he lavished on us. With all wisdom and insight 9he
has made known to us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure
that he set forth in Christ, 10as a plan for the fullness of time, to gather up all
things in him, things in heaven and things on earth. 11In
Christ we have also obtained an inheritance, having been destined according to the purpose of him
who accomplishes all things according to his counsel and will, 12so
that we, who were the first to set our hope on Christ, might live for the
praise of his glory. 13In him you also, when you had heard the word of
truth, the gospel of your salvation, and had believed in him, were marked with
the seal of the promised Holy Spirit; 14this is
the pledge of our inheritance towards redemption as God’s own people, to the
praise of his glory.
Barclay points out that the whole of this reading (verses 3-14) –
in the original – is one single long sentence. It is not so much reasoned
statement and ‘… a lyrical song of praise …’ He is not thinking in logical
stages, but ‘… because gift after gift and wonder after wonder from God pass
before his eyes and enter into his mind …’
We make sense of it by breaking it up into manageable pieces:
(i) At the core of the Christian life is God’s choice: Paul did
not choose God – God chose him! Jesus made this point strongly as recorded in
John 15:16. To Paul, everything was of God and this caused him to give thanks.
It would not be that great if man chose God, it is wonderful that God chose
man.
(ii) Paul thinks of the bounty of God’s choice: God chose us to
bless us with those things that are only available from heaven. There are many
things that we can achieve for ourselves: skills, position, material goods; but
what we can never achieve for ourselves is ‘goodness’ or ‘peace of mind’.
Barclay comments: “God chose us to give us those things which he alone can
give.”
A moment’s reflection takes this further. There remains today the
important question of what is meant by ‘good’. Many say that it is that which
provides happiness for the majority; but what about sizable minorities? Are
they to be utterly miserable because only the majority count? Society has
unquestioningly accepted this as just the way it is in a democracy, i.e. that
misery is the lot of all too many. Because 51 % are happy it is just illogical
that the wishes of 49% should not be considered!
Others suggest that ‘goodness’ like ‘yellow’ cannot be defined
at all – you know it when you experience it intuitively. But people’s intuition
does not always agree (even though on the basics they have a point). But this
is not the place for a detailed philosophical discussion of ‘goodness’, what
matters here is that it is not something earned or deserved – like faith – it
is a gift from God and is linked with Barclay’s last point and that is that we
are chosen for a purpose.
(iii) We are chosen to be holy and blameless. The Greek word for
‘holy’ is ‘hagios’ which means difference and separation. A church is holy
because its purpose is different; ministers’ are holy because they are meant to
be different to others; God is supremely holy because God is so completely
different.
In the early Church (and it is my experience in Britain today)
that being Christian, and this means being different, means that the people of
the world sometimes even hate you because they cannot understand why you are so
different. I know this is your experience as well. Barclay suggests that the
Church has got things wrong in the sense that some have tried to erase this
difference between being a Christian and being worldly; some are reluctant to
make a stand, reluctant to challenge sin, reluctant to impose standards,
because they want to attract people and become popular. Barclay concludes: “In
point of fact a Christian should be identifiable in the world … Our being different
ought not to take us out of the world; it should make us different within the
world.”
It should be easy to identify the Christian within the school,
the shop, the factory, the office, the hospital ward, the law court – anywhere.
And this is the difference: we ought not merely to behave as human law requires
but rather within the laws of Christ. This meant disobeying the apartheid laws
because they contravened the laws of Christ!
Sadly, the world we inhabit is so conditioned to its own ways,
that, being a Christian can mean getting into trouble, as was the case with the
nurse who offered to pray for a patient; people being expelled from their
union. But, if enough Christians became ‘hagios’ – holy – answerable to Christ,
they would revolutionize society – for the good! And in the midst of our
present circumstances, don’t we need a revolution in our way of thinking,
because our economy, education, morals are rightly being questioned?
But we are not only expected to be holy we are also meant to be
blameless – ‘amomos’ – we need to offer ourselves as a sacrifice, giving every
part of our lives to God. Barclay explains: “… it is to challenge man to make
his whole life so perfect that it is a fit offering to God …”
We Christians ought to be different – good people – because we
have been made good – sanctified - by the grace of God. This should be obvious
to all and be as transparent as the goodness of Mother Teresa, St Francis and
all the great saints. Impossible! No because it is not our doing it is what God
does in us – the reason why he has chosen us. When we are good and holy and
blameless we do not become arrogant or proud because we know this is God’s
doing for with us because such virtues are impossible for us to achieve.
Barclay concludes:
“… the Christian sets no value on the judgements of
human standards, but thinks only of how to satisfy the scrutiny of Christ …’
Ephesians 1:5-6:
5He
destined us for adoption as his children through Jesus Christ, according to the
good pleasure of his will, 6to the praise of his glorious grace that he freely
bestowed on us in the Beloved.
These verses include the lovely image of adoption and it is
worth a brief re-visit.
It gives God pleasure to adopt us into his family. This is a
lovely thought and is increasingly so for me as I have now spent so many years contemplating
the greatness of God with my philosophy students. To think of St Anslem’s profound
definition of God as “… that, than which, nothing greater can be conceived …”
This creator of everything that exists – universe after universe – and that
which is beyond human understanding – so great – yet cares for Mark Andrew
Smith and David Rhys Owen enough as to adopt us into his family – is a
wonderful thought.
A reminder of the process of adoption …
In the Roman Law that was operational at the time of St Paul,
family law was based on the principle of ‘patria potestas’ – the father’s power
– which was absolute: a father could sell a child into slavery and even kill
his own child! A child could not possess anything even inheritances or gifts
unless the father allowed it and he could take these things back if he so
willed. So it was a serious step to move from one ‘patria potestas’ to another.
It was carried out in the form of a symbolic sale in which
copper and scales were used. Twice the real father sold the child and twice he
bought the child back, but on the third occasion the sale went through. After
this the adopting father went to the principal Roman Magistrate – the Praetor –
and pleaded the case for the adoption. Once this was completed the adopted
child had all the rights of a legitimate child in the new family and lost all
the rights to the old family.
Barclay applies all this to the experience of the Christian. We
were members of the family of the world and absolutely in the power of sin.
God, through Jesus, has taken us out of that power into His power. Our adoption
into God’s family ‘… cancels and wipes out the past and we are made new. We
have passed from the family of the world and of evil into the family of God …’
Ephesians 1:7-8:
7In
him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses,
according to the riches of his grace 8that he lavished on us. With all wisdom and insight
…
In this section we encounter three of the great ideas of the Christian
faith: (i) redemption, (ii) forgiveness and (iii) wisdom and insight:
(i) Redemption: Here the word used is ‘apolutrosis’ which
literally means ‘to ransom’. It was commonly used to refer to ransoming a
prisoner of war or a slave or freeing a person from the death penalty for a
crime. It was used for God’s ransoming of the people of Israel from slavery in
Egypt. Barclay comments:
“In every case the conception is the delivering or
the setting free of a person from a situation from which they themselves were
powerless to liberate themselves, or from the penalty which they themselves
could never have paid.”
This is precisely what Jesus does for us, in that we are
powerless without God’s grace, and fall under the domination of sin. We know
the wrongness of things in our lives, but we are powerless to do anything about
it.
(ii) Forgiveness: The ancient world was haunted by the sense of
sin. This was the theme of the whole of the Old Testament. Barclay comments:
“It might well be said that the whole of the Old
Testament is an expansion of the saying, ‘The soul that sins, it shall die.’
(Ezekiel 18:4)”
Deep down, all people are conscious of their guilt and stand in
terror at the thought of God. Barclay illustrates this by suggesting that all
the plays of Aeschylus can be seen to be founded on but one text: “The doer
shall suffer.” He adds:
“Once a man had done an evil thing Nemesis was on
his heels; soon or late Nemesis would catch up on him; and punishment followed
sin as certainly as night followed day.”
Jesus changed all this because he opened the way to God; he
teaches us not of God’s anger, but of his love and forgiveness.
(iii) Wisdom and insight: The two words used in Greek are
‘sophia’ and ‘phronesis’ and the Greeks believed that if a person possessed
these things, they had everything they needed for life.
Once more Barclay comes into his own by explaining the cultural
context. He explains that Aristotle defined ‘sophia’ as the thing of the
searching intellect and the questioning mind and it is ‘sophia’ that is the
answer to the eternal problems of life and death, God and humankind and time
and eternity.
‘Phronesis’ (in English – prudence)
is the knowledge of human affairs where planning is necessary, or as Plutarch
explained – the practical knowledge of the things which concern us. Cicero was
of the view that ‘phronesis’ was the knowledge of the things which are to be
sought and which are to be avoided; Plato spoke of the disposition of the mind
which enables us to judge what things are to be done and which things are not
to be done. Barclay concludes:
“In other words, ‘phronesis’ is the most practical
thing in the world. It is the sound sense which enables men to meet and to
solve the practical problems of everyday life and living.”
Here, St Paul is saying that what Jesus brings is ‘sophia’ – the
knowledge of eternal things, the intellectual knowledge that satisfies the
mind; and ‘phronesis’ – the practical knowledge - which equips us for everyday
living.
What a lovely balance. With Jesus – and his living presence
within our lives today and every day – we are given the tools to deal with the
problems of both eternity and time – or as Barclay concludes:
“Christ gives to us the ability to see the great ultimate truths
of eternity and to solve the problems of each moment of time.”
Redemption, forgiveness, wisdom and insight – what lovely gifts
– all free and unconditional to those who would receive them.
No comments:
Post a Comment